this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
193 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

58698 readers
4283 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

They could have tried again with another booster and landing pad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

The landing pad wasn't really at risk. If they had hit it it would have been relatively low speed, by the time it was at the catch attempt it was at like 30 km/h or something. Hitting a big steel object at that speed would have probably done more damage to the booster than anything else

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Not necessarily, the launch tower is something like a half billion dollar piece of infrastructure and if it had been damaged or leveled it would have been an enormous setback in terms of money and time, as the second tower is nowhere near ready

[–] [email protected] 1 points 49 minutes ago

Trying again doesn't necessarily mean trying again right away.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think you've got too many zeros on your price estimate, no? The tower is huge, but there's no way it costs five hundred million dollars.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

My numbers are correct