this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
817 points (98.7% liked)

memes

9958 readers
1736 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

A strawman

I think this one might be made of tightly bound dried hemp. ๐Ÿค”

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How is it a strawman? Even the person I replied to said it isn't realistic to follow the letter of the overcaution.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

it's not realistic to not smoke weed until later in life?

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's not realistic or even reasonable to avoid all pleasurable activities that come with risks, which weed falls under, until an entire third of your life is over, no.

We let people under 25 play contact sports, drink alcohol, and consume large quantities of sugar, all indulgences potentially more detrimental to the body than Marijuana.

Look at all the research on contact sports and the massive risks they bring, it's weird to me those are still legal for kids.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ah, so we allow lots of other detrimental and dangerous things, so we shouldn't be so persnickety about this either. That's what you're saying. We should overindulge, not be overcautious.

Mayhaps if people were less of a bitch about it, it would be realistic and reasonable.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah. It's carved to be vilified, which is hypocritical not just because there are other equivalent harms we allow young people to pursue for pleasure, there are several considerably more harmful harms we allow young people to pursue for pleasure.

All because an old newspaper magnate's paper pulp business interests were threatened by hemp and it became tradition.

You can cause severe brain damage and kill people with alcohol, tobacco, and concussions. The studies I've seen about Marijuana in teens handwring over <5 IQ points with chronic use.

It's inconsistent to the extreme.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My intent was not to vilify weed. In fact, if I hadn't found it before 25 I probably wouldn't have even made it to 25. If you know what I mean.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I understand intimately, my friend!

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Cumulative head injuries will harm a brain far worse than cannabis.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

It can be, but it's not realistic to expect everyone will. Especially 'til 25. Of course some people never try it. But someone who's interested isn't likely to wait that long.