this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
774 points (94.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5765 readers
2503 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not so much the connector; but the power delivery standard.

Type A maxes out at 5v 3a = 15w and is often limited closer to 5v 1a = 5w for public-use charging ports.

Type C and its power delivery standards can get as high as 50v 5a = 250w (though usually closer to 20v 5a = 100w)

Then again.... The negotiation for what voltage/amperage to supply happens over the data lines which you don't want connected on a public charging port...

I dont really see a good solution here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, obviously that's always been an option.

I dont see a good solution for the topic we were actually talking about: creating high-power public use charging ports.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Charge the powerbank with the public charger. No data to steal, no expensive phone with sensitive electronics to break.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

One day, I'm sure there will be a defcon talk about reprogramming powerbanks to fry devices.