25
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Yes, but this time for realsies!

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Are you claiming there was already a recent change to Russia's nuclear doctrine, I'd be very interested to see a source.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

No, it's the opposite - they're saying that this isn't a change in Russia's behaviour.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I know what they're saying, but you seem to have misunderstood what I said. To my knowledge this is the first change in Russia's nuclear doctrine, so there's no "again" here. This is a significant change in nuclear use policy, and it would be sheer idiocy to dismiss it lightly.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

It is the next step in a continued escalation of the nuclear threat.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Russia's actual nuclear policy has been "fire nukes if Putin says so" for decades. This paperwork doesn't represent a real change.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

No it hasn't and it's incredible that a grown ass person genuinely believes this.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

Putin has been yapping about nuking the west if they cross whatever red line he made up that week for years.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I dare you to quote Putin as a proof. There’s simply no direct well defined threat from Putin on this topic.

There’s one from Medvedev, but he doesn’t represent Russian government and is not an official spokesperson for Russian government.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

[citation needed]

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
25 points (82.1% liked)

World News

32105 readers
575 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS