this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
889 points (98.3% liked)

US Authoritarianism

805 readers
295 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just because it isn't possible to know doesn't mean there isn't a definite correct answer.

A destination can exist without a pathway to it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

okay prove it. otherwise you're just making an assumption.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What did I have for breakfast this day 20 years ago?

  • You don't know who I am

  • You don't know where I live

  • You don't know what is culturally accepted for breakfast for me

  • You don't have any way to get a recording/CCTV video of me eating on that day

You do not have any pathway to arrive at the correct answer. However there is still a correct answer. I did in fact eat breakfast 20 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yes but you have to consider that with a religious text there may not have been a single intended interpretation. that's like half the fun of mysticism after all

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is still there though, even if there is multiple possible answers.

Name any of the meals I had on this day 20 years ago. I almost certainly had more than one meal that day. But there still isn't a path to get to the correct answer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

okay, here's a better question: does it matter if an interpretation is wrong? just because it is wrong doesn't mean it can't still be valuable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If the spiritual elements of it are valued, yes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

just to be clear, your answer is that it matters that an interpretation is wrong if the spiritual elements are valued? could you clarify?