229
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago

Which GPL violations is he referring to?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

from the article:

I am well aware of how licenses work. That's why I changed, to make it very clear and a deterrent due to certain parties violating the old license, by not attributing and stripping my copyright. Packagers being collateral damage was a beneficial side-effect, considering they don't clearly mark their versions as modified (also a GPL requirement), break functionality, and expect upstream to provide support.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

Yes exactly, but which parties? Who actually violated the GPLof Duckstation?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There was a game company called Arcade1UP. I think that they violated the license, so this guy went all nuts. Earlier, he was also being harassed for AetherSX2 under a different alias.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Damn. Big shame. GPL violations are far too fucking common.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
229 points (99.1% liked)

Open Source

30479 readers
96 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS