this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
49 points (96.2% liked)

RetroGaming

19555 readers
158 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
49
The TrimUI Brick Takes Inspiration From The Analogue Pocket | Time Extension (www.timeextension.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The TrimUI Brick Takes Inspiration From The Analogue Pocket

TrimUI has recently announced the release of their new device, the TrimUI Brick, which features a design heavily influenced by that of the popular Analogue Pocket. With its wide range of FPGA cores and software emulation capabilities, the Analogue Pocket continues to draw interest from fans.

The announcement of the TrimUI Brick highlights an ongoing trend in the market—companies copying successful design elements of established products like the Analogue Pocket to create their own versions.

While the TrimUI Brick may not support physical game cartridges, it boasts an Allwinner A133 Plus chipset, providing a 3.2 inch 1024×768 IPS display, and offering the Analogue style for enthusiasts on a lower budget.

One unique feature set apart from its inspiration is the inclusion of an RGB light at the top of the device. While it shares some similarities like a stepped back design (lacking a cartridge slot) and three function buttons on the front, the overall functionality isn't as directly emulated due to the device's reliance on software emulation.

Would you consider purchasing the TrimUI Brick based on its design and features in comparison to the Analogue Pocket, or do you prefer physical console releases that support original game cartridges for authentic retro gaming experiences?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The overall design is very similar, and you've even got the 'stepped' back (minus a cartridge slot, as this runs entirely on software emulation)

The author of this article doesn't realize that FPGA hardware emulation doesn't need a cartridge slot. Software emulation doesn't preclude it either. Either way, the big difference here is that Analogue is FPGA hardware emulation and this new device is all software emulation. It is a nice looking device though!