307
submitted 7 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago

We're always going to end up with people who can manipulate a crowd being in charge. We're stupid like that.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

This is what I always find amusing about the Communist argument.

Like, the elected politicians and bureaucracy can't be trusted enough to regulate industry under capitalism so we'll centralize things and then trust them to regulate industry under Communism?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago

Like, the elected politicians and bureaucracy can't be trusted enough to regulate industry under capitalism so we'll centralize things and then trust them to regulate industry under Communism?

If that's your understanding of Communism, then you need to read The State and Revolution. Quite a lot of Communist theory is concerned with eliminating the concept of beauracracy.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 hours ago

In theory, democracy produces satisfactory outcomes...

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Of course bourgeois democracy doesn’t produce satisfactory outcomes for the working class. It doesn’t represent the will of the working class, but rather that of the capitalist class.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

Democracy does produce satisfactory outcomes, what changes reality is the structure of said democracy. Very few systems are direct democracies, and direct democracies themselves are flawed even in theory.

You should read the text.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 hours ago

To be fair, I don't have to trust elected politicians to distrust unelected CEOs and other upper management more

[-] [email protected] -4 points 4 hours ago

But it's not like companies or business entities won't have folks in charge of them under communism... Someone has to run the whatevers...

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

But it's also not like the person who runs the whatevers has to be beholden to shareholders and profits. They could instead be incentivized to prioritize the collective well being of the workers.

And for that matter, politicians and the bureaucracy also live in a system that incentivizes (to the tune of millions in bribes) them to prioritize the interests of businesses owners, and thusly shareholders and profits, at the cost of the common good. Which is a major reason they can't be trusted.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 hours ago

Or, as has happened in capitalism, people will find ways to bend the system to benefit themselves. Except this time without boards so much as bribable officials and whatnot.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 minutes ago

Capitalism is explicitly designed for people to benefit themselves at the expense of others. Capital begets more capital in a positive feedback loop that results in massively powerful billionaires.

If you elect representatives, those representatives are checked somewhat by the threat of being voted out. Capitalism has no such check. Sure, ostensibly people can choose not to buy a product, but unregulated capitalism selects for monopolies.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

And now we find ourselves at the beginning of the meme.

Also, I find "people are greedy" to be an uncompelling reason to support a system that incentivizes greed and exploitation. If people bending a system to benefit themselves is a problem, then the system should be designed to be resistant to this, in a way that incentivizes promoting the common good. Or at the very least shouldn't encourage these problems.

Capitalism encourages these problems.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Ideally, supervision over most non critical sectors would fall to randomly drafted, single term committees of the people, think jury duty except better compensated and obviously with bureaucratic resources available to enable these committees to fulfil their role adequately.

Now this isn't suited for everything, but in either system any true oversight is done by the people, not the state.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 hours ago

Half of America wants to vote for trump and you want to trust in random people? That seems like a wild leap of faith.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Around 30% tops but more importantly what do those trump supporters want? The exact same things you do, they just believe different causes for the problems we all see and thus have wildly different solutions.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 hour ago

Shit, you'd better tell that to my aunt who told me how my lifestyle hurts her.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Cool have you done the work to find out why she thinks that way or what she actually wants? No? Great talk little buddy.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

It's more like 30% and that's with Americans being some of the most wildly mis-educated people out there. I'm sick of seeing sortition shit, but sicker still of misanthropy.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

Okay, would you rather the Germans who voted AFD? Or the rise of the French National Party? Or Fidesz in Hungary? Or PPV in Denmark?

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
307 points (93.5% liked)

Memes

45193 readers
2261 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS