this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
260 points (83.5% liked)

Technology

59583 readers
3853 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why did UI's turn from practical to form over function?

E.g. Office 2003 vs Microsoft 365

Office 2003

It's easy to remember where everything is with a toolbar and menu bar, which allows access to any option in one click and hold move.

Microsoft 365

Seriously? Big ribbon and massive padding wasting space, as well as the ribbon being clunky to use.

Why did this happen?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, actually—I have a VM reserved mostly for 16-bit software

Do you think that's normal? I made very clear in my comment I was referring to the vast majority of people, not a tiny majority of 80s/early 90s software enthusiasts.

Yes, actually

As above, do you think that's normal? I never said literally nobody, anywhere, on planet Earth does this.

Some of us do put our money where our mouths are, although I admit that isn't universal.

Exactly. And that's fine.

But the vast majority of people prefer UI now over what we had in the 90s.

but the amount present in contemporary design is way too large

In your opinion, sure. But that's not the prevailing opinion. People prefer modern designs.

If people liked it, that's what we'd have. Surely this is a simple concept?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If people liked it, that’s what we’d have. Surely this is a simple concept?

It's bullshit. Most people choose from among the handful of things the corporations offer them. You have to be exceptionally blockheaded to stay with an OS that no longer receives security patches, even if you prefer its interface paradigm, and if you're not the one controlling the machine you may not even have the option. The type of retrofitting I've done on my work machine is just that—work—and I understand why people may not want to do it, or may not be able to do it if they'd have to fight a draconian IT department for permission.

Furthermore, most people aren't designers or even terribly compute-literate. They don't necessarily understand which design elements are causing them to be so inefficient when they move to a different OS version, or how to revert them in cases where that's possible. They're stuck with Microsoft-Apple-Google's poor design decisions, until the same corp hands them another set of poor design decisions. The corporations don't want to decouple the UI from the OS the way Linux and other Unixoids do and let people choose, because the shiny new UIs are an advertising opportunity and impress certain types of reviewers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

You have to be exceptionally blockheaded to stay with an OS that no longer receives security patches

I never said using an OS from the 90s/early 2000s, I said theming current OSes as if they are.

But tbh, most people are that block-headed with tech (as you alluded to later in your comment). There will be plenty of people still on Win10 when support ends.