this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
17 points (94.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54411 readers
231 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've heard that tigole is the best, but i've also seen Silence, SAMPA, etc. Is there really any difference? Should I avoid any of them?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've tried to look into this by analyzing the media and encoder information, and all I've come up with is that tigole is slightly larger than Silence (by like 4%), but seems to use the exact same "sets" of encoding profiles. So in theory I believe they should be identical, but in practice might not be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On a related note, has anyone tried using e.g. VMAF as a metric for encoding "quality"? In theory that's what it's made for, so it would be interesting if the numbers matched up with reality as a way to measure different releases.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. There's a gui software called 'Nmkoder' that has an encoder built in called AV1AN. It basically cuts the entire video into a bunch of short segments, renders several copies of each short segments at different CRF values (basically Handbrake's RF values), gets the VMAF for each segment, saves only the one thats closest matches your Target VMAF, and stitches it all together at the end.

It works for AV1 and HEVC, and let's you pause and resume an encode at any time, though the whole process is quite a bit slower.

The real problem though is that doesn't produce an even size between source materials of different sizes. For example: a 5 GB Amazon screen rip can encode down to 1.5 GB at 95 VMAF or so. However a 60 GB bluray rip encodes down to 24 GB. One thing I really look for in an encode is a 5-15 MBPS HEVC video stream, so this doesn't really get what I'm wanting in most cases. It is fun to experiment with though.