38
submitted 4 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's more about, in this case, how he's openly sexist since that's what this alliance seems to be against. But either way that's a classic false binary. There's no reason they cant provide aid for both groups at the same time, it doesn't take away from either group to do that. This wasn't even much additional funding, it was a policy oversight thing who's stated goal decidedly wasn't "care more about women than disabled people".

[-] [email protected] -2 points 3 hours ago

That's true I suppose. His motivation does not appear to be altruistic but if it was a case of diverting limited funds, I can see his excuse not to fund this being reasonable.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Oh good, so you agree that his excuse is unreasonable then! I'm glad we had this little discussion.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Yes, thank you for the polite discourse.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
38 points (97.5% liked)

Ukraine

8066 readers
613 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS