this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
42 points (97.7% liked)

Emulation

3530 readers
1 users here now

Community to talk about emulation & roms.

RULES:

1.) No bigotry

LINKS:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Not what I am arguing, but we do have two issues: 1) naming/branding for these types of licenses 2) FOSS banshees acting like these licenses aren’t acceptable & the whole idea is binary good or evil

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

As long as we don't call them free, libre, or open source I don't care. We shouldn't make the terminology any more confusing for those.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There’s limited vocab to choose from & source available isn’t an appealing one

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, it definitely is more appealing from a marketing perspective.

I do understand why some projects might wanna use the term, it's to their advantage to be associated with "open source" even if the source code itself has a proprietary license.

The problem is that then it makes it harder / more confusing to check for actually openly licensed code, since then it's not clear what term to use. Already "free software" can be confused with "free as in free beer".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)