40
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As long as we don't call them free, libre, or open source I don't care. We shouldn't make the terminology any more confusing for those.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

There’s limited vocab to choose from & source available isn’t an appealing one

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

It doesn't really roll off the tongue, I get it, but it's the best and most widely used term for software whose source is available to view but not modify and/or redistribute.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, it definitely is more appealing from a marketing perspective.

I do understand why some projects might wanna use the term, it's to their advantage to be associated with "open source" even if the source code itself has a proprietary license.

The problem is that then it makes it harder / more confusing to check for actually openly licensed code, since then it's not clear what term to use. Already "free software" can be confused with "free as in free beer".

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
40 points (97.6% liked)

Emulation

3434 readers
2 users here now

Community to talk about emulation & roms.

RULES:

1.) No bigotry

LINKS:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS