this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
69 points (98.6% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
2263 readers
203 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Which is worse than risking skin cancer with sun exposure.
These skin cancer rates include basal cell carcinoma, which comprises 90%+ of all skin cancers. (I think it's really 98%+)
Note it's a carcinoma, not melanoma, meaning that it's benign in almost all cases, and doesn't spread unless untreated for a very long time.
The severely curtailed vitamin D production from the lack of sunlight is far more damaging. It's a significant cause of diabetes, and contributes to many disease processes. And you can't really supplement vitamin D as the form our body makes from sun exposure is different than any supplement we can produce today.
Then there's the cardiovascular impacts.
I wasn't making a value judgment, I was making a quippy conjecture.