Explain Like I'm Five

14270 readers

13 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

Be respectful and inclusive.
No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
Engage in constructive discussions.
Share relevant content.
Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Use appropriate language and tone.
Report violations.
Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Explain like I am a moron. If the US is such apparently a badass super power it has never tried to take over another country to expand its influence and status? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Countries used to think that invading others and getting more land and more people to rule over would make them more powerful. Some still think so.
But modern countries increase their influence through trade and their economy.

European countries used to control huge parts of Africa, and all it did was cost them money. Also, generally, people don't like being ruled by a foreign power. For a dictatorship that's OK. But for a democracy, having lots of people in your country that don't want to be governed by you is a big problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

used to? african countries are still subjected to a france-imposed currency with rules dictated by the french, arent they?