Cars - For Car Enthusiasts

3920 readers

1 users here now

About Community

c/Cars is the largest automotive enthusiast community on Lemmy and the fediverse. We're your central hub for vehicle-related discussion, industry news, reviews, projects, DIY guides, advice, stories, and more.

Rules

Stay respectful to the community, hold civil discussions, even when others hold opinions that may differ from yours.

This is not an NSFW community, and any such content will not be tolerated.

Policy, not politics! Policy discussions revolve around the concept; political discussions revolve around the individual, party, association, etc. We only allow POLICY discussions and political discussions should go to c/politics.

Must be related to cars, anything that does not have connection to cars will be considered spam/irrelevant and is subject to removal.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

A rotary engine better than Wankel? (www.youtube.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This vane engine is sexy and it knows it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

15:52

Good point about the vanes jamming in their sleeves potentially being a problem at startup. As RPM increases, centrifugal force will make it harder to retract the vanes, so they might need some kind of powered actuation beyond just a passive spring.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

If you go to like 15.05 he talks about how the vanes do make contact with the walls currently, so emissions and scaring like what happens in wankels is probably an issue. The Rolls Royce thing is more theoretical right now, sounds expensive, maybe doable IDK 🤷🏻.

I kind of hate how this guy "hangs a lantern" on all the flaws of the design. I appreciate the enthusiasm for the engineering but, don't act like it's perfect and everyone else is dumb for not thinking the same lol.