this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
290 points (83.0% liked)

Memes

45745 readers
1196 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

When Musk took over Twitter he allowed violent and extremist views to flood it without moderation.

That's the sort of community Lemmy would be if we didn't have the tools needed to keep it clean of harmful ideologies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You mean like Exploding Heads? I agree, fuck Nazis.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When nazis start enforcing their ideology I will raise arms, until then your sentiment closely resembles the goal of propagandists on these sites: create division and cause violence.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? Exploding Heads is a literal Nazi Lemmy Instance that was defederated by pretty much every major instance.

Or are you going on an Anticommunist rant?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I have no context about the community, I assumed you were advocating for exploding heads of political enemies as a way of keeping feeds clean, because the comment explicitly reads as such.

There is nothing communist about Nazis, just like theres nothing Democratic about the DPRK.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have no context about the community, I assumed you were advocating for exploding heads of political enemies as a way of keeping feeds clean, because their comment explicitly reads as such.

That's certainly a leap. Exploding Heads is a Nazi Lemmy Instance.

There is nothing communist about Nazis, just like theres nothing Democratic about the DPRK.

So it was a random anticommunist rant, unprovoked, lmao

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If anything I said seems anticommunist to you then clearly you don't know what communism is.

You should start referring to the nazi community "exploding heads" as "the nazi community "exploding heads"" if you dont want people to think of heads which are exploding.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I know quite well what Communism is, thank you very much. You're openly pro-NATO and anti-Communist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Lmao bro thinks the dictatorship country with the 2nd most billionaires is Communist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And those harmful ideologies are.?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

White Supremacy, Anti-immigrant, Anti-Trade, Anti-NATO, Anti-human-rights for LGBT, etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Anti-Trade

What does this mean?

Anti-NATO

It's good to be Anti-NATO, NATO has Nazi origins and serves as a way to maintain Western Hegemony, securing profits via Imperialism and defending said Imperialism through coalition.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Lmao

Mutual defense and deterrent to invasion by hostile world powers both in and outside of NATO is a bad thing? Sure, okay pal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

.

Also, don’t send us reports just because you don’t agree with someone. We’re not here to censor people for you.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh no! So you want to talk about how the mutual self defence pact is somehow oppressing you or will you just keep dodging forever?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Reason: User threatens me not to report his alt accounts for misinformation again

What alt accounts? What are you even talking about? That’s two bullshit reports in one day, wasting our time.

Reason: Claimes NATO forces other nations into subservience.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's an alliance between Imperialist countries, and the alliance itself has Nazi origins and has had Nazi leaders. Yes, it's a bad thing, because Imperialism is a bad thing.

It's a gang of countries that hyper-exploit the Global South in mutual defense against said Global South.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's literally only function is a deterrent to war, including by members against others as they will not gain NATO support unless they are attacked.

Its members might exploit, but thats a meaningless statement about NATO itself because without NATO there would literally be more war.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's literally only function is a deterrent to war, including by members against others as they will not gain NATO support unless they are attacked.

It's expansionist against the wishes of outside countries, and NATO exerts military pressure on the Global South.

Its members might exploit, but thats a meaningless statement about NATO itself because without NATO there would literally be more war.

Bzzzzt wrong. NATO's only function is to preserve Western Hegemony and dominate the Global South militarily, so that member-States can continue exploiting ruthlessly unopposed. This results in proxy wars, such as the Israeli genocide of Palestinians.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Its not expansionist because you have to request to join.

The only objecting countries whose wishes you're referring to are nations who want to invade potential NATO members.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Its not expansionist because you have to request to join

Bzzzzt wrong. NATO is expansionist because it pressures non-member states and routinely starts proxy wars.

The only countries whose wishes you're referring to are nations who want to invade potential NATO members.

Bzzzzzt wrong. Western Hegemony damages the Global South and NATO keeps member-states unaccountable.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You're accusing America of causing Russian annexation of Crimea and subsequent war on Ukraine?

You think Russia is working for NATO?

Pressuring people into a mutual defence pact lol such an evil thing lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

it's lemmyworld... they'll never learn that they aren't on reddit anymore.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Ah yes, free trade, the thing that improved the economies of ex-communist countries after the USSRs collapse and is on the path to fixing almost every African nations poverty.

Ah yes, NATO, the "we will only call for (and maybe possibly do something to enforce) human rights if it's convenient for us" alliance. And I'm sure all it's member nations have squeaky clean track records when it comes to international politics.

We must ban anyone against these things! That's dangerous extremist ideology

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

anti-NATO

A “harmful ideology”? Is someone paying you to spout this propaganda?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

NATO's only function is mutual defense, NATO support ends when a member attacks.

Since the only thing NATO does is prevent War, the only anti-NATO stance is a pro-war stance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The invasion of Libya was a NATO-led effort.

Stop lying.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you referring to the coalition of some NATO members and some non-NATO members (19 nations total) enforcing a United Nations Security Council decision to make an immediate ceasefire and end the civil war in Libya?

The one with zero troops on the ground?

Being in NATO had no impact on the events, NATO member support was not mandatory as per the terms of NATO. The only reason they even call it a NATO operarion was because Itally would only vote in favor of the operation if NATO members were in charge instead of France.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The reason for NATO’s involvement is quite irrelevant because they were still happy to step in and do the work. The fact is that it was ultimately NATO-led and their efforts did not lead to peace in the region.

To call NATO’s involvement in Libya ‘anti-war’ is sheer lunacy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I’ve got bad news for you: a lot of us are anti-NATO.

Also, what the hell is anti-trade? Do you want every Westphalian state to build a wall around itself?

Edit to add: Oh I see, you created this new account because @[email protected] got permabanned from lemmy.ml 😂 Let’s see how long this one lasts…

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Who do you think are supporting those?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Elon Musk, owner of Xitter

The fuck is that question?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

In context of lemmy... Really quick to anger