this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
864 points (98.5% liked)
Programmer Humor
32382 readers
677 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, but I think apparently the tests that "could" have caught it relied on mocks which basically rendered it useless in those cases.
Ah yes. The unintended consequences of mandated code coverage without reviewing the tests. If you can mock the shit out of the test conditions to always give you exactly the answer you want, what's the point of the test?
It's like being allowed to write your own final exam, and all you need to pass the exam is 90% correct on the questions you wrote for yourself.
Unit tests, yes, but you don't only do unit tests. Integration and e2e tests still exist.
And this is why mocks are bad…