19
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Just download the video then.

Youtube stop doing this because people would pause a Multi-Hour long video (such as a music video) download the entire thing, only to then only watch 15 minutes of it because that's the bit they wanted. Massive waste of bandwidth

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

The amount of times my video brings unplayable even though it has a few minutes buffered is too damn high. Almost all the times my video gets stuck, is that scenario. Not to say it happens all the time.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

What do you mean “waste of bandwidth”? We’re paying for that through government subsidies and selling our personal data. Are you seriously defending a corporation that made $250 billion last year in ad revenue alone?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

This is a weird point. Like yes, Google is a government subsidized monopoly. But to keep this feature is a massive waste of resources.

Like from a tech perspective, this should not be done. Like fuck Google can be a thing and will have no impact on that

[-] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

People hate corporations so much that they forget some times they do make smart choices. That bandwidth doesn't just exist from nothing, it's electricity being moved around. The environmental impact, even as infinitesimal as it may be, isn't worth the convenience imo

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

The hypocrisy of this when they're chugging power for AI....

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

If only there were some middle ground between multi-hours and 30 seconds.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

Seriously, load the next 15 minutes, then start loading that when it plays those 15 minutes

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Oh no, google lost .3cents of bandwidth. the horror.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Even if it was 3 cents in bandwidth (it's not), that's 1.3 billion dollars in additional costs. You want more ads to pay for that?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And thats probably a rounding error in googles costs.

For a much more usable, enjoyable experience.

That you're arguing against, because wont someone think of poor googles downtrodden finances.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Billion dollar costs aren't rounding errors even at YouTube/Google's scale. They're a measurable percentage of total revenue. I agree that it slightly improves the user experience, it's hard to imagine a worse cost/benefit tradeoff from an engineering perspective even at more realistic costs. It's especially hard to justify when there's an easy alternative for users in the form of downloading videos.

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5402 readers
4614 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS