this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
20 points (88.5% liked)

Comics

5897 readers
336 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

As a theory, sure. I just have yet to see it expressed in any functional way that didn't devolve into a shit show. See: Russia, etc.,

I think it's telling that so many wish for a return to communism but still defend Putin's atrocities. :|

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Russia devolved into capitalism. Funding a military is incredibly expensive and necessary when a communist country wants to exist in a world with the United States. This creates a militant economy that must be centrally governed to coordinate this military might. True democratic socialism is impossible as long as the United States exists as an imperialist force.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

True democratic socialism is impossible as long as the United States exists as an imperialist force.

1, That's silly, there's tons of democratic socialist countries that are doing just fine - today! Bolivia, Norway, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Canada, the Netherlands, Spain, Ireland, Belgium, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand - think the US fucks with their way of governing?

2, the USSR was never a type of democratic socialism. Period. They literally called it 'soviet democracy' distinctly, and it meant something WILDLY different that the kinds of democratic socialism we see in the above listed countries.

Your premise is faulty, built upon an imagined soviet union that did not practice the tenants you're endorsing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

None of those are socialist countries. They're all capitalist

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I guess you can stick your head into the ground and pretend democratic socialism isn't a thing.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/top-15-democratic-socialist-countries-181857008.html

it's stupid, but stupidity is always an option.

Of course, if you just toss these countries' accomplishments away, you're really just undermining the entire premise, because without these successes the record of 'socialism' gets a whole fucking lot worse.

lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're citing a capitalist finance website to prove your point about socialism. You seem to be confused between social democracy and democratic socialism. I understand because they seem so similar that they must be basically the same thing, right? Nope.

The Nordic model is a form of social democracy. They take many of the benefits that socialism provides and builds them into a capitalist economy. Democratic socialism is an actual form of a worker owned an operated economy.

If you're ever in doubt, ask the question, "who owns the means of production?" If the answer is huge megacorporations and wealthy billionaires, then it's a capitalist economy. If the answer is the working class, it's socialist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

if you just toss these countries’ accomplishments away, you’re really just undermining the entire premise, because without these successes the record of ‘socialism’ gets a whole fucking lot worse.

Ok, then.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

True democratic socialism is impossible as long as the United States exists as an imperialist force.

Not sure how to explain, but I don't think so.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The US has destroyed every socialist country in history that didn't have a strong enough military to fight them off

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My concern with this line of argument is that it bundles consequences from a system of government up with the consequences of trade embargoes and other hostile actions from capitalist economies. That doesn't make the actions of the dictators in those countries justifiable in any way, but might have precipitated conditions that made them more likely.

How would communist nations have fared if the US had taken a 'live and let live' approach to them? The approach during the cold war was that they couldn't be allowed to succeed. That led to the sort of standards of living where dictatorship tends to thrive. Note this isn't unique to communist countries. Look at the Republican party in the US, now that Neoliberalism is failing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

It also ignores that Socialism in AES states has generally resulted in mass reductions in poverty, increases in literacy, education, home ownership, and life expectancy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean by "devolve into a shitshow?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

See every communist nation in history

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I see China building renewable energy capacity, and crazy fast trains, faster than the rest of the world combined.

I see Cuba, a tiny island nation, still independent after 64 years of brutal US sanctions.

I see Vietnam, a popular retirement destination for American 'expats'.

I see Russia, being fairly shitty and also 100% capitalist for 25 years.

Hmm, seems like you may have been told a bunch of times that communism is bad but never really looked into it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

China is extremely capitalist lmao

I'm not fucking defending capitalism or demonizing communism, it's just never worked. I see absolutely zero reason to expect any difference if we tried it in the us

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

China is Socialist with Chinese Characteristics, the CPC practices large and extensive levels of State Planning and the People's Democracy structure means the Capitalists in China do not control nor guide the State.

Capitalism exists in China as a concession, it isn't some fully Socialized state, but it is a transitional economy.

Read China Has Billionaires.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

So large increases in literacy rates, life expectancy, home ownership, education access, healthcare access, and democratization of society is "devolving into a shitshow?"

Do you think Russians were better off under the thumb of the Tsar? Do you think Cubans were happier as slaves in Batista's US-backed slave-state? What point are you genuinely trying to make?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

First part is a result of industrialization.

Second part, no they weren't, but that just means that they were worse off before, not that they were great afterwards.

I genuinely think the idea of communism is great, but human nature will ensure that it will never be successful. There will always be someone who gets greedy and takes more for themselves in the pursuit of wealth and power.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

First part is a result of industrialization.

Partially, the other huge part is that the products of production were funneled into safety nets and state projects like railways and universities, providing free education and healthcare, and not corporate profits.

I genuinely think the idea of communism is great, but human nature will ensure that it will never be successful. There will always be someone who gets greedy and takes more for themselves in the pursuit of wealth and power.

What's considered "Human Nature" changes alongside Mode of Production. It isn't Human Nature to be greedy, greed is more often expressed within Capitalism.

Additionally, wealth disparity went way down in the USSR. It wasn't a case where some few individuals profited massively and others lived in squalor, wealth disparity skyrocketed after it collapsed.

Are you familiar with Marxist Theory? You have a decidedly Idealist take, rather than Materialist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What you’re talking about here are results of industrialization. The same can be said for capitalist countries during the Industrial Revolution.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

They were not. The USSR had free healthcare, education, incredibly cheap housing, all while it was far less developed than Western Countries. Development helped, yes, but what helped the most was Proletarian control and direction, not Bourgeois.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago