this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
580 points (94.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3139 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

If I recall correctly Gore (probably) won with a full state wide recount, but in the counties he asked for he ironically (probably) would have ended up losing.

That's how I understand it, based on what was reported regarding the four county recounts and media orgs doing research after the fact at a statewide level. But not just any recount - a recount using different rules for undervotes than were used for the original count and previous recount. Them wanting to do that was part of the crux of Bush v Gore - using different rules for certain counties than others violates equal protection.

Or fix the butterfly ballot issue.

Doing that would require re-running the election entirely, which definitely wasn't possible in the 5 days from when Gore started his final partial recount to the election deadline, especially since two of those were a weekend.

That doesn’t really answer the final question though. Is it going to be called Election Day like 7 of the 11? The day after(or really the morning after) like 2004 or 2016? Is it going to last days like 2020? Or weeks like in 2000?

Depends on how many recounts get called for and how many absentee ballots there are. 2020 was unique in terms of the sheer scale of absentee ballots, which extended the count. Trump also fought as much as he could legally for as long as he could, though that didn't really take the form of continuing recounts like it did with Gore.

I'm going to go with a couple of days for an initial count (either late day after or day after that, depending on number of absentee ballots), add at least a week if anywhere is particularly close (can trigger automatic recounts and are prime targets for candidates to request recounts). If Trump loses, then it depends how much of his lawfare against the election involves recounts if it stops there or not. If Harris loses, expect a few targeted recounts as well if anywhere is kinda close.

Either way I know two things for certain: Harris will win the popular vote, if for no other reason than because she's going to win California by a large enough margin that she could lose every other state by a margin within believable reason and still win the popular vote. And roughly a sixth or so of the country is going to claim the election was hacked, cheated or stolen in some fashion (basically a large minority of the losing party) regardless of who wins.