this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
5 points (72.7% liked)
Baldur's Gate 3
6250 readers
204 users here now
All things BG3!
Baldur’s Gate 3 is a story-rich, party-based RPG set in the universe of Dungeons & Dragons, where your choices shape a tale of fellowship and betrayal, survival and sacrifice, and the lure of absolute power. (Website)
Spoilers
If your post contains any possible spoilers, please:
- Use the text [SPOILER] at the beginning of your title, do not include any spoilers in the title.
- Use the appropriate spoiler markup to conceal that content in the body of your post.
Thank you!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Shove as a bonus action is significantly stronger than shove as an attack action, I’m not sure how you think being able to shove and attack on the same turn is a nerf.
Because the enemy gets the same thing. I meant it nerfs the sleep spell.
So it’s a nerf because the enemy plays by the same rules…? I don’t wanna assume but it sounds more like something you dislike than a nerf
You don’t seem to understand the comment. Shove is not nerfed, it’s overpowered. As a result the sleep spell is further nerfed (they already nerfed it by making it have a short duration) because enemies can just bonus action wake each other up, instead of being out of commission for multiple turns.
Oh you meant that SLEEP is nerfed because shove is a bonus action? Your sentence construction says something different. The pronoun “it’s” in your last sentence reference shove, not sleep. It reads like “shove is almost as useless as true strike.”
Given that I am not sure I agree since sleep is notorious for wiping low level parties and nearly universally useless against high level ones but YMMV
That's not quite right. "It's" references the subject of the sentence, which is Sleep. A second comma after bonus action would have made it more clear. At least that's my interpretation. Which really just highlights that it was ambiguous enough to have been better off rewritten in a different way.