this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
226 points (99.1% liked)

Ukraine

8208 readers
645 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I hope this is part of a bigger plan and not some desperation move.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Well if the current front lines are pretty entrenched, and it's hard to take back occupied Ukrainian land, then just go take unprotected Russian land to make it even. Didn't Putin say he was up for a truce if the current lines were kept? Let's see how he feels about that when he has to give up Russian land. At the very least it will force Russia to relocate troops and resources.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that is what Im hoping. But to force troop relocation, you have to dig in which takes time or you have to blitz to Moscow like prigozin, which would really be madness, but it could work.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't need to dig in. Just destroy factories, electrical transformers, oil infrastructure, and train yards.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Digging in actually makes sense. Russia has to attack, and then they’re sending meat waves to die for their own land, not ukrainian land.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Anders' analysis makes sense and he's usually spot on. https://youtu.be/A4mg1ZUb-7s

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Ah cool. I subscribe to the guy as well!