Technology

59197 readers

3588 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

393

Google loses DOJ’s big monopoly trial over search business (arstechnica.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To frame this question differently, why is Apple able to sell default access on their devices?

Quick math shows Apple makes ~100 Billion per year. The article states Google pays ~20 Billion to Apple per year. That's a significant value to Apple.

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the decision, but curious how Google paying Apple is a monopoly, but Apple offering search to the highest bidder isn't also a problem (or maybe it is).

As another example, how well did the EU browser choice ruling have on consumers choosing a browser.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I wonder if Apple does a cost analysis on search every year and frequently go "NOPE" at the current state of search.

Apple Maps took years to shed it's reputation. A Apple version of search would being a lot of negative press. And they can't exactly handshake with Microsoft and Bing, as Bing has its own negative reputation.

All the smaller search engines, so they fit into the Apple mindset?

At the end of the day, they'll take Google's money. While finding a way to make their own.