Technology

59623 readers

3546 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

2057

uBlock Origin developer recommends switching to Firefox as Chrome flags the extension (github.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

272 comments fedilink hide all child comments

~~https://www.neowin.net/news/ublock-origin-developer-recommends-switching-to-ublock-lite-as-chrome-flags-the-extension/~~

EDIT: Apologies. Updated with a link to what gorhill REALLY said:

Manifest v2 uBO will not be automatically replaced by Manifest v3 uBOL[ight]. uBOL is too different from uBO for it to silently replace uBO -- you will have to explicitly make a choice as to which extension should replace uBO according to your own prerogatives.

Ultimately whether uBOL is an acceptable alternative to uBO is up to you, it's not a choice that will be made for you.

Will development of uBO continue? Yes, there are other browsers which are not deprecating Manifest v2, e.g. Firefox.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 73 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Why not just recommend not using Chrome...?

[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Avoid chromium browsers

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Switching to another Chromium-based browser is a half-measure. Other Chromium-based browsers are on borrowed time.

As time goes on, it will become more difficult for them to maintain v2 support. Nobody has the resources to properly maintain a browser fork with more than minor modifications. And you can bet Google will go out of their way to make this difficult for everybody else.

I mean, sure, use what you're comfortable with if you really can't use a non-Chromium-based browser for some reason. But it means you're likely going to have to jump ship again sooner or later. Why not just jump once, to something with better long-term prospects?

Then again, the folks behind Arc Browser have expressed interest in becoming engine-agnostic, so perhaps there will be a Chromium-free Arc version in the future. That would be very cool.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

They don't need to maintain V2, they can bundle native adblockers like Cromite.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago

Other Chromium-based browsers are on borrowed time. As time goes on, it will become more difficult for them to maintain v2 support.

And Firefox won't? I just explained why you don't even need v2 support.

Nobody has the resources to properly maintain a browser fork with more than minor modifications.

Except...all of them?

And you can bet Google will go out of their way to make this difficult for everybody else.

If and when that becomes a problem, I can change later just like I can today... Today it is not a problem.