this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
20 points (95.5% liked)
Games
16644 readers
632 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As obviously self-serving as Epic has been since this all started, it's also been instrumental in breaking the walled garden ecosystem precedent across the board, so this is great to see.
Agreed. We can both appreciate the good that comes out of their battles, and still dislike them as a company. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.
"Let them fight."
If it were purely self-serving, they'd agree to settle with Google on special terms similar to those offered to a number of other publishers. Court proceedings last for years, as would be obvious to Sweeney, so sacrificing years of revenue for the distant prospect of having to pay 0 to the platforms is easier explained as being ideological than a business decision.
They also have their own store that they want to supplant the existing players. They spent money and resources on a commercial for a law suit in an attempt to weaponize social media for that store before laying off several hundred employees.
The store came to be as an "f you" to Apple, as evident from the email exchanges at the time. The 1984 trailer from Fortnite seemed to be in the same vein. I don't think that particular trailer was for the purpose of promoting the EGS, as there's not a single hint to the store in the video or its standard placement.
And I'm sure that's an argument they would use, too, but they're very open about their ambitions elsewhere, and taking down their competitors (other stores) helps theirs stand out when they're plainly out of ideas as to how to do so otherwise.
To be clear, I'm glad those other stores are being taken down a few pegs. Once again, this is helping everyone. But it's from such naked self interest.