How do you feel about storing binary files with Git? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I think it's generally agreed upon that large files that change often do not belong while small files that never change are fine. But there's still a lot of middle ground where the answer is not so clear to me.

So what's your stance on this? Where do you draw the line?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

The main downside is Git downloads all history by default, and so any large files will bloat the download for people cloning your repo forever. It isn't about binary vs text. It's just the size that matters.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024

17 points (100.0% liked)

Git

2826 readers

1 users here now

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Resources

Rules

Follow programming.dev rules
Be excellent to each other, no hostility towards users for any reason
No spam of tools/companies/advertisements. It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.

Git Logo by Jason Long is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]