255
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 62 points 1 month ago

What if Biden spends the war chest on Harris's behalf?

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago

It’s stupid regardless. You can pass on funds iirc

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

It would be stupid even if you can't pass the funds. A PAC can still spend that money supporting her, and it resets the individual donation limits.

The big ticket donors would all get to donate again.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Stupider than that. She's a listed candidate on the original filing.

I worry thought about both how long the Supreme Court can delay and how stupid Trump judges can be.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Are these public funds yet?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Then all those donors get to donate again because the campaign finance limits no longer apply, and Biden can spend that money on Harris's behalf.

The legal approach just isn't going to work out in there favor. If the money doesn't go to Harris, all of a sudden she gets a do-over with all donors and it can go to a PAC which will spend it on her behalf.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
255 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3376 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS