this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
7 points (88.9% liked)

Selfhosted

39650 readers
293 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I consider open source software to be community owned/maintained so I never liked the idea of selling the software. It makes much more sense to my eyes to sell services surrounding the software be it support, customizations, or even hosted services.

I can't really get over selling a "license" for a software that is expected to still be maintained by unpaid contributors. Especially under an AGPL license where any licensing changes has to be approved by every contributors.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah this getting into a fake toss shit . All starts with FUTO crap and some previous shady movements they did . This will die eventually

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How is it "fake Foss" when you can just download and run the code without paywalled features and not spending anything.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I could understand the argument if Immich relicensed to the FUTO Temporary License, which technically isn't open source, but since immich is still AGPL this makes absolutely no sense