this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
13 points (58.2% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7176 readers
1509 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That wouldn't be enough to LITERALLY remove him, but it would be such a strong signal of disavowal from people who he himself appointed that he'd be effectively dead to the party already.
True. It would still be unethical unless he was actually medically unfit, though. Regardless of debate performance, he's probably not actually senile yet, which they would know better than we would just from working with the guy regularly.