this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

Spaceflight

602 readers
14 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

With a great flight rate comes great responsibility.

This is a really bad look for the rest of the launch industry that isn't able to step up to fill the gap.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Bad look? What's the Falcon failure rate at this point?

Now what's the failure rate of any other reusable platform?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bad look for the rest of the industry

The fact that the entire rest of the industry combined can't step up to provide flights is an indicator.

If ULA were to go offline, flights could be moved to other companies and the industry might have a hiccup but would otherwise barely be noticed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Ah, I didn't catch that meaning. My apologies.