46
AMD's FSR 3.1 upscaling tested: improved over FSR 2 but DLSS and XeSS are still ahead
(www.eurogamer.net)
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
46 points (97.9% liked)
Games
32507 readers
1541 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is DLSS an open standard like FSR? No? Ok then it doesn't matter if DLSS is marginally better.
XeSS doesn't rely on specific hardware and is still better. It matters.
It does though doesn't it, it has a fall back execution route on non-intel GPUs that isn't as good?
In the few games that I played that had both, FSR 3 ran much better than XeSS. XeSS was a little better than FSR 2 (granted, not hard because FSR 2 often runs worse than native for me) but FSR 3 typically had 20+ more FPS than XeSS. Maybe they run better on Intel gpus but those are still too experimental and too low performance for me to even consider at this stage.