this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
155 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

59039 readers
3203 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ersei, the developer behind this so-called Cloud Native Computer, says the project was primarily a “silly” pursuit. There is also a problem with booting from Google Drive currently being very slow. However, the dev also boasts that “the possibilities are endless” and would welcome any companies or individuals who wish to get in contact and discuss commercializing this project or something related to it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My guy, I'm not the one making non-sense statements and then refusing to answer questions about them. You're the troll.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

What is so hard to understand about one needing two full physical computers, while one needs a single full physical computer?

refusing to answer

I did answer and the statement wasn’t nonsense. What’s hard to understand about the difference between two and one…?

One has redundancy and one doesn’t… not shockingly they are different things for this reason…..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You said you could access the cloud with zero computers.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I did? Where? I said you can still access one when a portion is down unlike the other. How does that mean zero?

Did you seriously make a joke while not even reading or understanding my comment? Or did you reply to the wrong person originally? That would make you the troll, no?

Given the context of accessing “remotely” from the comment I responded to, I figured the context of my comment was obvious. But of course trolls find the smallest insignificant thing to latch onto.

I’m sorry you couldn’t tell a comment responding about accessing something remotely, WOULD ALSO be talking about that same thing… I even edited early last night to clarify this simple reading comprehension concern. Since people love ignoring context to derail conversations. Thats you, a troll derailing a conversation since you missed the extremely obvious context….

Yeah jokes tend to not work and are stupid when you actually look into them, usually because you need to ignore something, like the context of the original conversation….

So not only is the joke not even remotely funny, you are just a moron for missing the obvious context….