Asklemmy

43956 readers

841 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

[Serious] What's your hot take? (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

286 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Tears of the Kingdom is a terrible game, it's a mod of BOTW but with more ways to skip the exploration so you don't get to memorize the map like in Elden Ring or Fallout.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure I exactly agree. I feel like it would be a better game than botw if I hadn't already played botw. Still suffered from most of the same problems.

Also the combat is so bad it encouraged you to avoid it whenever possible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

It's definitely a glorified DLC that was stretched into a whole game. The new things are mostly good but 80% is just exactly the same.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't say terrible but mid possibly. It just took something that already worked well and added a little extra to it.

If "thing2: the sequel" attaches a something kinda neato to the revolutionary, gaming landscape changing "thing1:the thingining" that doesn't mean thing2 is really better than something that significantly moved the bar.

This is why Fallout 3 is better than Fallout New Vegas and I will fight you all over it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Fallout New Vegas has better writing than 3