this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
66 points (89.3% liked)

Privacy

32465 readers
514 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
66
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hello, making this post to get some honest, and technical opinions about GrapheneOS. Please do not be bother by this question. No drama here pls ๐Ÿ™. I've heard that there is some of the google code into the "sandbox" feature. Say your opinion below! ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Again, you demonstrate that you don't have the sufficient knowledge. There is no commerical device with open-source firmware. "Security Requirements" are not some kind of marketing bullshit as you seem to think. Graphene's can be found here: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

I doubt you understand what any of them mean, since you seemingly think Windows 11 requirements are just random things that are just there to hurt you.

You thinking that Stock Google devices are more secure than GOS simply shows that you fundamentally lack the understanding of how things work. They are built on the same core but Graphene has massively reduced attack surface and fewer ways to exploit remotely. And then we didn't even talk about the hardened kernel and such.

I wouldn't try to discredit projects I don't know anything about if I were you.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/single-board-computers (2021)

https://pine64.org/documentation/ROCK64/

Pine64 boards rarely need proprietary software and they don't need it to boot like the raspberry pi does. However, that is a discussion for another time.

You are also illustrating my point. The Graphene community has a my way or the highway mentality. As it turns out stock will often be more secure as it will have the latest security updates and will have less people handing it in general so less risk of supply chain attack from a bad actor in the community. However, this is a non issue. I find a lot of the so called security holes to be fairly mild as they require very specific targeting to exploit.

In general, the people around Graphene os and Divest OS are very toxic. In the F-droid board meeting the issue was brought up that the is censorship is promotion happing for Divest OS. People who criticized Divest OS were getting banned. The person who brought this complaint has a page where they go over there beliefs and bring forward evidence. I think they are a bit harsh but they do have a point.

http://opinionplatform.org/