this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
826 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4804 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Its more like, the president can assassinate you if it is in the interest of the USA and not for the personal interest of the president.

So if ellected, Trump can assassinate all political competition, Putin-style, legally, but not Stormy Daniels

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Who's to say that maintaining the dignity of the office of President is not in the interest of the US? She is impugning his reputation therefore making him look weak which could embolden our enemies. She must disappear for the good of all Americans. It's not hard to justify just about anything as an official act in the interest of the US.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

If "maintaining the dignity of the office of President" is a core obligation of president, Trump could be impeached and convicted of that charge.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not according to the way they define "official act". If it involves presidential power, it's an official act.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Then it is a joke of a decision

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago

It is indeed. From a joke of a court.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not really. Exercise of a Presidential power, no matter the reason, is immune from prosecution. If it's legal to drop a bomb on ISIS it's legal to drop a bomb on a pornstar.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

So letting district courts decide if an action is or is not an official act, is just a joke if anything a president does is official act

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A lot of people are reading this wrong. What is likely going to happen is that the district court will say that a grand Jury can decide if something is an official act. That might be challenged again but I'd wager that's the next stop in this saga.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

But don’t forget that official government records and any inquiries as to the motives of the president will not be admissible as evidence in any such case.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

So Stormy Daniels will have to avenge democracy, Rambo style

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I’d re-up Netflix to watch this movie.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

But whose interests are "the interests of the USA?"