conservative

946 readers

78 users here now

A community to discuss conservative politics and views.

Rules:

No racism or bigotry.
Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.
No spam posting.
Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
No trolling.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

132

Donald Trump found guilty in historic New York hush money case (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] unwaveringegg -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

not interesting

competency is only your opinion

So just say you think he's competent despite all evidence.

You're conflating two separate points I made because naturally, you cannot fathom why "Family Values" isn't interesting to me, but I understand why you did it.

This is your opportunity to explain yourself and you keep responding which says you want to address ... something.

Explain myself for what? I'm not a conservative. You used ™ in your snarky post because you assumed I was a conservative - because those are their values .

Either way, my motivation here is curiosity. Answer, don't answer, but I will keep poking until you decide its not worth your time to keep waffling.

I'm responding to you only because I know you're being disingenuous. So why are you pretending like you actually care?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If you're going to spend all this time, lets just hear your answers.

You’re conflating two separate points I made

You've repeatedly said "issues", plural. Lets give you the benefit of the doubt, assume its an error and you're not a liar who is such a coward about sharing their opinion they would rather accuse people repeatedly of responding in bad faith to poison the discussion than answer a simple pair of snarky questions honestly.

[–] unwaveringegg -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you're going to spend all this time, lets just hear your answers.

I can spend my time addressing how disingenuous you are.

Lets give you the benefit of the doubt, assume its an error and you're not a liar who is such a coward about sharing their opinion they would rather accuse people repeatedly of responding in bad faith to poison the discussion than answer a simple pair of snarky questions honestly.

You searched through this sub to find someone to answer your snarky questions. If you were being sincere, I don't think you would ask in the way you did.

Again, why pretend you're actually interested in having a civil discourse when you started off on the wrong foot? And you clearly picked the wrong person since I'm not a conservative as what you asked are conservative values.

Perhaps you should rethink how you approach others with political disagreements next time. Cause this sounds like a skill issue on your part.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

No, I got my answer: You're a coward. You find it safer to address tone than answering a challenging question. Its okay, child, the mean, disingenious person will stop bothering you and hurting your fee fees with snark.

[–] unwaveringegg -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No, I got my answer: You're a coward.

Good coping, jackass. You were looking for a gotcha moment and instead got egg on your face.

Its okay, child, the mean, disingenious person will stop bothering you and hurting your fee fees with snark.

The conversation didn't go the direction you wanted to. I'm sorry you feel that way. You don't have the intellectual maturity to engage in good faith conversations and that's something you need to sort out yourself.