33
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Need to make a primal scream without gathering footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh facts of Awful you'll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Funny, as I also assume LLMs will cause the death of the Junior Developer, but not because the job dissapears, but because due to relying on LLMs devs never really build the skills to understand software and will suck so hard people will not hire them for the junion -> senior positions. And it gets even worse for the junior dev when the LLMs enshittify (either by the output degrading or the deal altering more and more pray they don't alter the deal further).

Guess the difference of opinion here is calling people who use LLMs junior devs vs calling them senior devs.

I'm oddly reminded of the person who used copilot to write a script to do something (which they offered to others), and didn't know what http errors meant. (they just asked the LLM how to fix it).

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

"DevOps" is a word meaning "sysadmin who can still use the command line"

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

@dgerard @Soyweiser I thought we were SREs now. At least, the message for years was "Sysadmins are useless shit now because they aren't software engineers and hell, they don't even call themselves engineers".

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

a euphemism treadmill of "keeping shit working"

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

@dgerard Sometimes I feel like a hospital doctor who's worked in the clap clinic for decades and has had a series of name badges starting with "Venereal Disease" and passing through "Special Clinic" on the way to "Sexual Health Clinic". Same thankless job, just different labels.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Same basic lessons, too… “consider the risks of giving root privileges to people you just met”, etc.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I don't feel like any great shakes as a sysadmin, then I encounter someone with the same job title who has clearly never used a command line before

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Wait there are people who cannot use the command line. No wait again, don't answer that please.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

There are "sysadmins" who have to be dragged kicking and screaming to using the command line.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

..what... What would they use instead?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

having seen the horror from a distance: VNC, a fuckton of clicking, occasionally mouse and keyboard macros, possibly a networked KVM (itself not a bad idea at all for emergency access to hardware too commodity or misdesigned to have a sensible serial console, but we’re talking day to day here), and a massive chip on their shoulder about being forced off their beloved Windows Server 2003 and onto Linux

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

How do they sysadmin a server that doesn't have any display devices aside from the terminal then? Which in my experience is almost all of them?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

how dare you deny them their bounty of GPUs for every server in the rack

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I have had the actually quite heartwarming experience of us hiring on a serious NT BOFH (someone who knows precisely how to wave a hammer at NT to intimidate it) and he sees how Linux does stuff and is trepidatious but eventually delighted

then there are others

i'm at like the pointy-clicky stage with NT admin and sometimes it's just not enough, cos it's Babby's First OS but with several layers of tentacles underneath

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1276 readers
66 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS