this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
48 points (100.0% liked)
Individual Climate Action
143 readers
1 users here now
Discuss actions that we can directly take as individuals to reduce environmental harm.
related communities (decentralized only)
somewhat closely related to individual action:
- [email protected] - Chatter on reducing GHG by way of reducing consumption of animal products (not necessarily environment-specific)
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected] - Another vegan community, but apparently unreachable from slrpnk.net
- [email protected]
- [email protected] - Landscaping in diverse low-waste ways
- [email protected] - Buy stuff that lasts a long time, if you must buy something
- [email protected] - Buy stuff that lasts a long time, if you must buy something
- [email protected] - fix it, don’t replace it
- [email protected]
- [email protected] - exercise your right to fix stuff
- [email protected] - exercise your right to fix stuff
- [email protected] - sustainable technology
- [email protected] - To discuss computing that’s not resource intensive
- [email protected] - To discuss computing that’s not resource intensive
- [email protected] - To discuss waste avoidance
- [email protected]
- [email protected] - sustainable travel, if you must travel
less closely related to individual action:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected] - For chatter specifically related to green energy
- [email protected] - Economics of reducing excessive consumption
- [email protected] - Discuss CO₂ removal
- [email protected] - Discuss forestation and reforestation
- [email protected] - Discuss reclaiming disturbed lands
- ~~[email protected]~~ ← ⚠ moderator locked a civil, on-topic, science-supported post without cause (see “The core of the climate social problem: stubbornness. The mitigating effect of psilocybin is worth a look” in the modlog)
- [email protected]
- [email protected] ← climate change discussion without excessive moderation
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’m not sure what the individual action is here. But I also struggle with why any action makes sense. When there is no pipeline, the fuel is still transported. It goes via 16 wheelers instead of by pipes, and those 16 wheelers have substantial emissions on their own. On the upside, it drives up their cost of transport to not have a pipeline. But OTOH consumers are addicts. They will just buy their fuel at any price. It doesn’t quite work like typical markets. Car drivers will pay for the nose for fuel. They get more angry as price goes up but they cannot be broken. Even a 10-fold fuel increase wouldn’t get those stubborn motherfuckers onto bicycles. So it seems like fighting pipelines is not the best use of human energy.