Videos

14284 readers

154 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

Videos only
Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
Don't be a jerk
No advertising
No political videos, post those to [email protected] instead.
Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both [email protected] and [email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Neil deGrasse Tyson reads his peer review of Terrence Howard's mathematics theories (youtu.be)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He’s also just a bit of a prick regardless. There are so many more entertaining science personalities that don’t act pompous as fuck.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I think "prick" is a bit far. I don't think I've ever gotten any malice or ill-intent from him. He's just a very blunt speaker who may not immediately recognize the social repercussions of what he's saying in the moment. I think he recognizes this and constantly apologizes for the way he speaks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

he has had some dickish moments but when you’re constantly talking publicly that’s pretty inevitable unless you’re a saint.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not a fan of Joe Rogan but I did watch clips of his interview with Neil and prick definitely seemed like an appropriate term for him after that. Watch the clips if you don’t believe me.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I watched them. There's nothing there that is aggressive at all. He very clearly laid out and explained the issues with the ideas put forth by the ideas in that paper, and explicitly said why he did it that way (that's how a colleague in science would note things), and further said if you're to be taken seriously, you should expect such feedback from peers who are reviewing your work. That's quite accurate.

What was your take on this that sounds negative?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

He interrupted Joe constantly and came off as arrogant, condescending and abrasive.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qwZXR2PlcEM

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh no...Joe Rogan gets interrupted by a certified genius in between idiotic thoughts.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago

Hmm, so you’re now arguing in bad faith, that took a turn. I’m officially out as you seem to think it’s OK to be rude and condescend if you’re a “certified genius”. I must be speaking with a certified genius here, I had no idea.