this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
65 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1010 readers
25 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
self@awful.systems
blakestacey@awful.systems
dgerard@awful.systems
65
EA is becoming a cult? It must be wokeism fault (x.com)
submitted 6 months ago by shinigami3@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
87 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

what the heck EA forum doesn't have a block feature? That's just... ew.

Also how long have all these people been obsessed with "woke" and "the left"? Because it's been really obvious and over the top lately.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 13 points 6 months ago

what the heck EA forum doesn’t have a block feature? That’s just… ew.

You don't need a block feature if you're as insufferable as the average EA /j

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because they’re the wealthy or at least believe in wealth’s ability to do good. A basic interpretation of EA would say that you should start a company, and maximize profit even at the expense of worker compensation so you have more to give to charity

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They approximate by forming private companies that they then talk about as if they're 501(c)3 charities and pay accordingly, or less - see our friends such as Kat Woods at Nonlinear here for a previous worked example.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Gamergate. Nuff said.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

nah. under whatever name, the reactionary racists have been in the rationalist subculture since the '90s at latest

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

If we trace one ancestry path back to science-fiction fandom, well, there's John W. Campbell.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

yeah, I have posited previously that the California Ideology traces in a straight line through science fiction to Rudyard Kipling.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 7 points 5 months ago

"And a waifu is only a waifu, but a good cigar is a smoke."

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 9 points 6 months ago

Ah, I do believe I now see a bit of an extra in the reason for the makeup of the story in that one writer/writing episode of DS9

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

In the first Foundation story, there's a weird mention of applying symbolic logic to human language that comes from nowhere and goes nowhere. Campbell insisted upon it because

he felt in our discussions that symbolic logic, further developed, would so clear up the mysteries of the human mind as to leave human actions predictable. The reason human beings are so unpredictable was we didn't really know what they were saying and thinking because language is generally used obscurely. So what we needed was something that would unobscure the language and leave everything clear.

Clear being a fortuitous choice of wording on Asimov's part there, given, well.

TESCREAL and Scientology don't just share methodology; they both descend directly from "Golden Age" science fiction. In this essay I will

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 6 months ago

you're so much more graciously subtle than I'm feeling tonight, but then I did clock my brain out after this fucker of a week