this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
809 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59583 readers
3546 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Moritz Körner, Member of the European Parliament, disclosed the decision on Twitter. Swedish publisher SVG said, “The question was removed at the last moment from Thursday’s ambassadorial meeting in Brussels”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Such a rule is basically un-enforceable. Because it is nearly never exactly the same text. So it is always the first time voted on.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

What they could do is create a law that protects the integrity of E2EE. At least in this case.

But I guess that will never happen... Well, a girl can dream.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It was protected by the ECHR in a recent ruling. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/03/european-court-human-rights-confirms-undermining-encryption-violates-fundamental

However, Chat Control 2.0 argues that since the spying is done before the content is encrypted, it's somehow ok. 🙄

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

It seems ECHR is best court. They fuck Putin, they fuck mass surveilance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Or law that forbids any mass surveilance. By any entity.