this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
68 points (97.2% liked)

Work Reform

9976 readers
49 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 66 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The real takeaway here is that Wells Fargo pays for work that isn't quantifiable via review of the work product. What are these people doing that produces nothing that can be reviewed to quantify their performance to such a degree that simple mouse movement is the only metric they can be judged by? If I were stupid enough to be invested in that criminal enterprise I'd be pissed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The article doesn't say the fired employees were doing this all the time. They could have used them for an hour here and there while they were out running an errand. Very difficult to spot that on any work review.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If they had measurable productivity that was acceptable then who cares if they needed to step away for a while? Wells Fargo is sending a message that they care more about warm seats than actual results.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Oh yeah I agree 100%, this whole thing is ridiculous and shows wells Fargo don't trust their employees and have to resort to this kind of bullshit.

I'm just saying it's possible that these employees were fired merely for using this mouse moving software, not because they weren't getting much work done.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

If that's the case then I'd be pissed at whoever is supposed to handling PR for letting the story get out without framing it in the best light