this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
431 readers
73 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our winter banner is a shot of Shotley marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Testing Jersey's seawater all year round is being considered after a recent pollution outbreak, a minister has revealed.Environment Minister Steve Luce said he decided to take a look at the water testing situation after high levels of E. coli were found in Grève de Lecq in May, leading to a warning not to swim there.He said water at 16 bays in Jersey were tested regularly between May and September, but he was asked by people why testing was not done every month.Mr Luce said this had prompted him to consider doing year-round testing, but added it could cost "several thousands pounds" to conduct monthly tests.
The minister said water quality at Grève de Lecq had returned to an "excellent" rating and an investigation looking into the incident was ongoing.Last month, Andy Jehan, the Constable of St John, said a partial blockage on an incoming sewer to one of the pumping stations was believed to be the cause of the outbreak.
Mr Luce said the number of people who swam in the sea all year had gone up since the Covid-19 pandemic.He said this was part of the reason why monthly water quality testing was being considered.But he added he would need to think about whether it would provide value for money due to the additional costs the tests would bring.He said: "There's obviously quite a resource implication for me if I have to have people going in the water testing and having those tests analysed all the year round.
"There will be several thousands of pounds, I'm sure, of additional costs and I need to weigh up those costs against the benefit to the public."
Follow BBC Jersey on X (formerly Twitter), external and Facebook, external.
Send your story ideas to [email protected], external.
The original article contains 292 words, the summary contains 293 words. Saved -0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!