I had In The House - In A Heartbeat playing in my head while making this meme
sorry for the pixelation in the corner, I used a shitty website which put a watermark there
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
496 points (93.1% liked)
memes
10273 readers
4103 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
Sister communities
- [email protected] : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- [email protected] : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- [email protected] : Linux themed memes
- [email protected] : for those who love comic stories.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What’s that from? And how does it support your point?
They absolutely are, they are discriminating people who would be a burden on their social nets, the fact that you’re trying to say they are two different things speaks volumes about your conservative character.
You’re justifying discrimination people for one thing, while decrying another. Not a shocker that you’re a hypocrite, and are still digging that same hole while not explaining how it’s different. Just saying it’s not doesn’t prove anything lol.
I also didn’t need to go past the first, since all the others have income limitations too…
Alright, here's another thing for you to try to follow.
You not understanding a distinction doesn't mean it isn't obivous.
You’ve also yet to answer the question about which two countries you specifically have claimed are better than others. Until you provide that, no one here should take anything you have claimed in good faith. Every place discriminates on disability in some way, you just got educated on how….. I’m sorry this is so hard for you to comprehend, income limitations are to prevent people from coming in and abusing the social nets.
Can you provide a country without one so it can maybe align with your claims…? Or just answer the original question of which 2, they can be ripped apart and this entire thing is done and over.
Either you’re right or not, you can only provide the means to prove that. Let’s go dude.
I was kind enough to google the whole thing for you and you couldn't make it past the first example in the quote I was kind enough to pull (didn't even bother with the article proper, I presume).
So no, I'm not doing any of that. You already have homework and I already have nothing else to prove. Go have fun.
You weren’t kind enough to do anything… you were asked for two specific countries, and provided a very easily disproved link that never supported your original claim…. Probably everyone discussing this topic here has googled and read that before, every country has an income limitation. We’ve established how that discriminates against disabled.
I’ve read far more articles about this, you seem to be one who hasn’t done their homework, and you hold this asinine idea it’s fine to discriminate one way and not another. Everyone always finds a ways to justify their behavior sexist, racists, xenophobia, conservatives like you that protect their hypocrisy on others.
The onus is on you dude, you’ve made the claim, people have debunked it for you, you either support it more, or stop digging in about the same dead point. All it’s doing is showing your hypocrisy as we’ve established comments ago.
I’ll give you an easy one. How is income limitation not discrimination, please. This should be easy for you to answer, and should show us why you are being a piece of work. You went and made another claim you need to support now, let’s go, you fucked up dude.
You can arguing about arguing all you want, it's not gonna change the facts.
But I do love the "read more articles about this". The thought of which articles is chilling, considering.
You provided an article, or do simple words confuse you thus?
And what facts? More claims, let’s see these facts that have now claimed have been provided.
Why can’t you answer simple questions? You want to claim the income limitations aren’t discrimination, yet you won’t explain how… what a shocker.
If you do, we can easily explain how it isn’t, but clearly you have trouble accepting that your opinion can’t be wrong.
OK, here's what you do. You start this thread from the top, then you get to the part that tells you how this works. Then you stop.
I did, there’s lots of people explaining the same thing to you…..
https://lemmy.zip/comment/11051328
It’s a very simple concept, using income as a limitation, is a free way to discriminate against anyone you want who would be a burden. And you get people like you, who justify it, so they get to continue to do it. You want less, raise it, want more, lower it. They picked a specific number for a reason…..
Look we explained it, and we didn’t even need to get your opinion, since it’s just plain wrong…. Shocker….
If you have money, you’re not a burden… as we established back at comment 2… yet you continued to argue this same asinine point.
It's not an opinion, it's how things work, as established by both reality and personal experience. You can keep the inane responses for as long as you want, friend, you're not gonna dimension hop.