this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
72 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37746 readers
498 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Oh wow, so even more radioactive waste that will afflict thousands of future generations and the environment for a tiny amount of produced energy now :(

[–] [email protected] 54 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (10 children)

Coal plants spread radioactive waste into the air.

Fission plants leave a hot turd behind, but at least it can be buried in one spot out of reach instead of everyone breathing it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Yeah sure, coal plants obviously have to go. But why not invest in sustainable energy production?

Nuclear waste cannot just be buried, unless you don't care about polluting huge areas with radioactivity. In Germany, there have been decades long debates where to store nuclear waste and even to this day there hasn't been found a good storage for the waste we produced in the 70ies. And this shit costs billions of euros that the company profiting of the plant doesn't have to pay but that in turn society has to pay.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I see fission as a transitional technology, like CFL light bulbs vs LED lighting.

The transition has been struggling for 60 years for political reasons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Yes, I get that. But I think we should just keep in mind that it is no sustainable or long-term solution. Since many people have started talking positively about nuclear energy in the last few years, I think it is important to remind everyone of the problems that arise with it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)