this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
8 points (90.0% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1227 readers
1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

[email protected]


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15985920

With the UAP disclosures came this, a breakdown of the most likely origins of UAPs

it's from a video with the Colonel Nell that was in the discussion of the SOL foundation video with the same man

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There’s zero doubt” that non-human intelligence has been interacting with humanity.

This is just so preposterous.

An entitity so advanced it could reach us from another planet, and yet it occasionally fails to conceal itself from us?

We're talking multiple orders of magnitude more advanced...as far as we currently understand, FTL is impossible (the energies required for space-folding concepts are beyond realistic).

This is more misdirection by gov/military/intelligence agencies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

To start, the post is about a large range of proposed origin of UAP. Why did you latch onto extraterrestrial when it encompasses a small fraction of suggestions of what non-human intelligence could be?

You then make the assumption that they are from another planet that would require FTL travel and that they are concerned about being seen.

Did you look at this post and have you listened to Karl Nell's discussions? It seems that you came in here to make an argument without understanding what you were arguing against.

I'm not stating that Nell is right in his claims, but please at least address the claims he's made.