this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
114 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
34858 readers
50 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, letting your contract run out before you have properly migrated is not a reasonable strategy, it's mind-boggingly stupid and pathetic.
And this doesn't even go over the fact that the Google Cloud infrastructure was where the application that helped fight CSAM and harassment lived and there has been no contingency plan for moving it or getting it back up and running.
It is when you don't have a billion dollars. Any losses this incurs less than a billion dollars are actually an improvement on the bottom line...
Tough times when even the second richest guy in the world can’t afford to pay his bills.
You don't get to be that rich by paying bills.
idk about you but i’ve no idea about how twitter is run, there’s plenty of reasons they would be unable or prefer not to do that 🤷♀️
There is literally no reason to do it like that other than incompetence. Platform migrations, especially for something as large as Twitter, are incredibly large undertakings that need a lot of skilled people. All those skilled people have long continued their careers at other companies.
You don't need to know how Twitter is run, that is simply IT and business management 102.
Incompetently, from the looks of it.
do you have access to their financial reports? otherwise how can one make such claims wrt to profitability (which is the issue at hand)
like, i kinda see it wrt the whole blue checkmark fiasco, but the issue with profitability goes much deeper than that, both in terms of time (during which this problem existed) and design (how much is it embedded into twitter as an application)
There is literally no reason to do it like that other than incompetence. Platform migrations, especially for something as large as Twitter, are incredibly large undertakings that need a lot of skilled people. All those skilled people have long continued their careers at other companies.
You don't need to know how Twitter is run, that is simply IT and business management 102.
i don't really understand how you can be so confident while knowing nothing or very little about running such an insanely complicated platform as twitter
My brother in Christ, what?
while twitter as a concept is a pretty simple platform, scaling, load balancing, etc a service with hundreds of millions of users is pretty complicated
Lol, I'm regularly working with companies such as Twitter as a consultant :)
I can't believe people come to Lemmy of all places to defend Twitter and Musk. I've come here a month or so ago when the reddit news broke, but damn, it changed so much these past few days. I kind of already miss Lemmy as it was.
ok, then (depending on what kind of consulting you do though) you should know that operating and migrating such a services is a big challenge?
i'm not even sure what we're debating: twitter is incurring a lot of hosting charges, and they're trying to mitigate that...