1193
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago

Yikes. I've never read Asterix and Obelix, but did they really make (I assume) the only black character a straight up knuckle-dragging gorilla imitation? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Cartoons back then were a little bit sambo so to speak, but the intent wasn't strictly malicious, just uninformed.

You use the words/concepts you know to express something to an audience. If society tells you that native Americans wear headdresses, then you will likely add a headdress when introducing a new native american character, not neccesarily realising the damage of the stereotype behind it.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He's possibly the only reoccurring black character, and yes it is very much a product of its time.

In defense of the authors the Gauls are all depicted with large bulbous noses, the Romans with Roman noses, etc; all cariceturs. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caricature.

In the attached image you can see Obelix is also depicted as a "knuckle dragger" (at times). The character leading them is a Roman.

This second example shows the Vikings.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
1193 points (92.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32060 readers
776 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS