1088
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

Balaji provides a great example of how not to think about developing systems that use AI. If you can build a system that is human-like in perception and cognition, then you don’t need anything more than what a human uses to navigate driving. His statement is like saying “I solved this problem because I didn’t actually attempt it”.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

The problem stated is self driving cars, not use AI to self drive on roads unchanged from those used by human drivers.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

How is it self driving if it’s on fucking tracks my guy?

Edit to say I get that “tracks” may not literally be required, but that’s besides the point

Edit2 note that self driving as a term has been agreed to convey autonomous driving. If you’re thinking of trams or trains as self driving than you need to use the fucking correct terminology of self propelled. You cannot redefine a term because you failed the problem or don’t want to attempt it

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Oh no I'm shook

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
1088 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5408 readers
2437 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS